About Me

Name: Bill Garcia
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

The Relentless attacks on Huckabee

The attacks are relentless… but the poll numbers say it all: Reuters/Zogby - Huckabee and Giuliani tied in 2008 Republican race

December 19, 2007

It appears, for now atleast, that the assult by Romney, Thompson, bloggers, and all the “non-believers” are having a negative effect. No, not on the Huckster, but on those doing the attacking.

Conventional wisdom would think that attack, after attack, and more attacks would do harm to any candidate - and it could, in time. But for now, it seems that the feeding frenzy is putting Mike Huckabee in the spotlight. Here’s the good thing: as dozens of new articles per day are popping up, the smart voters (not smart in that they know everything, rather smart in that they want to learn the facts) do their research, get to know Mike Huckabee when visiting www.mikehuckabee.com, look at the facts, and realize how these attacks, for the most part, are petty, without merit and totally untrue.

Even more so, when you have folks like Catholic League president Bill Donahue having a problem with Mike’s “Christ in Christmas” commercial (huh??) or conservative critic Rich Lowry saying if Huckabee is the nominee it’ll “represent an act of suicide” by the Republican party, it just tells me, and most of you, that hey - these guys must have a lot of money and muscle backing Giuliani and Mitt Romney because it just doesn’t make sense all these attacks (unless of course, they just can’t stand the fact that Jesus’ name is actually being used in public)

Essentially, the negative attacks are having a positive result for Mr. Huckabee. If I were to see any of Mutt Romney’s attack ads, then look at the Hypocrite himself during Tim Russert’s MEET THE PRESS interview (CLICK HERE) I’d be like “hey wait - he’s got some nerve accusing someone of what he’s totally guilty of”

See, Mitt Romney is desperate. Unfortunately for him he can’t run from his record like this 1994 photo of Mitt attending a Planned Parenthood fund-raising event (CLICK HERE) . His objective at this point is simply a “don’t look at me, instead, here, look at Mike, even though it’s not true” attitude.

As far as Thompson, well, he too is desperate because the Christian conservatives he was hoping to get are actually behind Mike and he knows he has to paint Mike as a liberal. But yet again - those that seek to know the truth would realize that the Truth Squad sets the record straight.

So - lets see what today’s (Dec. 19th) latest numbers look like according to Political Correspondent John Whitesides:

DES MOINES, Iowa (Reuters) - Mike Huckabee has surged into a virtual tie with front-runner Rudy Giuliani in the national 2008 Republican presidential race two weeks before the first contest, according to a Reuters/Zogby poll released on Wednesday.

Huckabee, a former governor of Arkansas whose campaign has caught fire in recent weeks, wiped out an 18-point deficit in one month to pull within one point of Giuliani, 23 percent to 22 percent.

Among Democrats, Hillary Clinton’s national advantage over second-place rival Barack Obama shrunk slightly to eight percentage points as the races for the White House tightened in both parties. Clinton had an 11-point edge last month.

The shifting numbers have changed the shape of a dynamic presidential race two weeks before Iowa on January 3 kicks off the state-by-state process of choosing candidates in each party for the November 2008 election.

“Huckabee is on a roll, he has gotten an enormous amount of publicity and he is doing very well with conservatives, who at least for now appear to have found a candidate,” pollster John Zogby said.

Giuliani, the former New York mayor who has led most national polls since early in the year, saw his support drop from 29 percent to 23 percent in the survey. His one-point lead over Huckabee was well within the poll’s 4.8 percentage point margin of error.

Huckabee moved ahead of former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who was in third place at 16 percent, former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson at 13 percent, Arizona Sen. John McCain at 12 percent and Texas Rep. Ron Paul at 4 percent.

The groundswell for Huckabee, a Baptist minister with close ties to religious conservatives, has been fueled in part by his growing support among that key party constituency.

Among likely Republican voters who say they are “very conservative,” Huckabee drew the support of 43 percent, with Thompson second at 20 percent and Romney third at 16 percent.

FLUID RACE

Those voters who describe themselves as “born again” gave Huckabee the lead at 33 percent, with McCain in second at 17 percent and Romney with 14 percent.

The number of undecided likely Republican voters dropped from 21 percent last month to 9 percent. The race remains fluid enough to be shaped dramatically by the results in Iowa on January 3 and New Hampshire, where voters go to the polls on January 8.

“Voters are starting to at least pay attention and identify with someone,” Zogby said. “But it doesn’t mean they have made up their minds for good.”

Among Democrats, Clinton held a 40 percent to 32 percent lead over Obama, an Illinois senator, down slightly from 38 percent to 27 percent last month.

Some other polls have shown the national lead for Clinton, a New York senator, shrinking even more dramatically — and disappearing completely in Iowa and New Hampshire.

Former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards was well back in third place at 13 percent, with Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware and former New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson tied for fourth at 3 percent. Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut was at 1 percent.

“Obama is moving because he is building strength among young people and independents and growing his lead among black voters,” Zogby said.

Obama, who would be the first black president, led Clinton among likely black voters by 19 points, among independents by 16 points and among young voters age 18 to 24 by 34 points.

Clinton, who would be the first woman president, led Obama among likely women voters by 12 points and among older voters aged 55 to 69 by 16 points.

The percentage of Democratic voters who said they were undecided in the race was down to 4 percent from 14 percent last month.

The poll was taken last Wednesday to Friday. It surveyed 436 likely Democratic primary voters and 432 likely Republican primary voters, with a margin of error of plus or minus 4.8 percentage points for both parties.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Politics NJ interview

Dec 10, 2007



My interview with PolitickerNJ.

Huckabee bloggers look forward to bonding beyond virtual world

Fortified by political events in the heartland, Mike Huckabee spear carriers have been slowly but determinedly appearing on the Republican primary battlements in New Jersey.

They know they’re not mobilizing major operations on the East Coast. To get a sense of how Huckabee’s been doing here, in Quinnipiac University’s late September poll, the candidate was two points ahead of Sen. Sam Brownback - who was no longer in the race.

But Huckabee’s Arkansas erstwhileness and Good Book credentials have catapulted the former governor into a double-digit lead over former front-runner Mitt Romney in Iowa, inspiring even his north of the border, shore-hugging supporters.

My site has gone from 20 or 30 hits a day three weeks ago, to between 75 and 100 hits a day,” said Bill Garcia of Englishtown, who in the early fall set up NJChristiansforHuckabee. “Something is definitely catching on.”

“When I set up my website in early September, I was getting seven hits a day - this was before the Huckaboom,” said family man David Friedrich, a teacher in Hopewell Township and founder of Nj4huckabee.blogspot.com. “Now I’m 30-40 hits per day, and a lot of those hits are starting to originate from New Jersey. I’m thrilled.”

Operating independently, Garcia and Friedrich said they both helped collect signatures for Huckabee in time for today’s state Division of Elections deadline to get their candidate on the ballot. Friedrich mailed his in. An official coordinator from the Huckabee campaign accepted Garica’s signatures yesterday at the Day’s Inn in East Brunswick.

“I do know you need 1,000 signatures and we had a goal of 1,700, which we surpassed,” said Garcia, a 42-year old family man and financial planner. “We submitted them in person with a notary public on hand at the hotel.”

Garcia admitted Huckabee’s supporters here have still not gone from the virtual to the animal warmth stage, and are just now scheduling meet-ups around the state to go face to face with others on the Huckabee trail.

“He’s a Christian, and I’m a Christian,” said Garcia of his chief reason for supporting the candidate, an ordained Baptist minister. “It happens I’m also a Baptist. I like the fact that he’s pro life, he’s winning me over on the fair tax. I agree with him on immigration and healthcare. I agree that we don’t want Hillarycare. We want the market to dictate prices.

“Basically it’s conservative family values,” Garcia added. “We need to go back in time rather than forward, in terms of our values.”

In addition to appreciating his candidate’s views on education, healthcare and immigration, Friedrich said of Huckabee from the standpoint of first principles, “he embraces social conservatism and the sanctity of life. He recognizes that marriage is between a man and a woman.’

Panic-stricken by Huckabee’s rise in the polls in Iowa, former Mass. Gov. Mitt Romney, a Mormon, last week gave a speech to try to crystalize his Christian beliefs for the sake of uneasy voters.

Garcia wasn’t convinced.

“I like Romney as a guy,” he said. “But I’m also a Baptist. It’s on my blog, and it’s not intended to be an insult but Mormonism is a cult. The teachings are not the same. He didn’t win me over. Maybe America just isn’t ready for a different faith, but in Mormonism you’re subject to officials. You have to drop what you’re doing when they call. If they ask you to do something to increase membership or help with donations, you have to do it. It is an issue.”

Friedrich likewise was unmoved.

“I like Gov. Romney, and I know they were saying over the last few months that he had been planning to address faith and religion,” he said, “but I question the timing of the speech.”

For Romney’s supporters in New Jersey, it’s not his religion that distinguishes the former one-term Massachusetts governor’s public life as much as family values, political results and a business background.

“Romney’s the only first tier candidate who’s got a stable family life,” said former Assemblyman Dick Kamin. “It’s important to show what America’s about.

“He turned around that fiasco in Utah with the Olympics, and he functioned effectively as governor in a very Democratic state,” Kamin added.

Decidedly in the minority here as former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani trounces both Romney and Huckabee in New Jersey polls, Garcia and Friedrich are nonetheless convinced they have a winner nationwide, and look forward to bonding and working with others committed to a Huckabee presidency.

“I don’t know much about politics,” said Garcia. “But a few months ago I didn’t know anything about blogs either.”

Click here to see the actual article

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hillary Clinton on Abortion

Do we really want our next Commander-in-Chief to have this kind of philosophy and voting record? What kind of character does this candidate portray with a record like this?

Information was gathered from the site ontheissues.org


Hillary Clinton on Abortion

Democratic Jr Senator (NY)


Lift ban on stem cell research to cure devastating diseases

Later today, the president will veto a bill passed by Congress to support stem cell research. I co-chair the Alzheimer's Caucus in the Senate. I've worked on helping to boost funding for research to look for cures and a way to prevent so many devastating diseases. And we know that stem cell research holds the key to our understanding more about what we can do. When I am president, I will lift the ban on stem cell research. This is just one example of how the president puts ideology before science.
Source: Take Back America 2007 Conference Jun 20, 2007

Abortion is a sad, tragic choice to many women

Clinton Seeking Shared Ground Over Abortions, read the New York Times. It was 2005, and the story was about a speech Hillary had given. "Yes, we do have deeply held differences of opinion about the issue of abortion and I, for one, respect those who believe that there are no circumstances under which any abortion should ever be available."

Hillary said: "We can all recognize that abortion in many ways represents a sad, even tragic choice to many, many women."

Hillary is correct. Abortion is tragic. But why? What makes an abortion "sad, even tragic" is that an unborn child loses his life. Her "sad, even tragic" comment is not the first indication that Hillary believes it is indeed a child that is ripped from the womb during an abortion. In 2003, while debating a proposed ban on partial-birth abortions, Hillary referred to the unborn child as "the child, the fetus, your baby."

[Nevertheless,] Hillary has spent a lifetime fighting to keep abortions legal.

Source: The Extreme Makeover, by Bay Buchanan, p.134-136 May 14, 2007

Fought for years to get "Plan B" contraceptive on the market

In the last few years, we've seen major breakthroughs in research and effectiveness of contraceptives. For example, Plan B is a new emergency contraceptive that can prevent a pregnancy after another contraceptive has failed or after unprotected sex. I fought for years to get Plan B on the market, so that fewer women will face the choice of abortion. It is now available for over-the-counter use by adult women.
Source: 2006 intro to It Takes A Village, by H. Clinton, p.301 Dec 12, 2006

Prevention First Act: federal funds for contraception

In 2006 Hillary teamed up with nominally pro-life Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid and pushed to increase federal funding to abortion providers such as Planned Parenthood in order to "increase awareness" about unintended pregnancies.

Senator Clinton co-wrote an editorial with Reid titled, "Abortion Debate Shuns Prevention." The piece said, "As two senators on opposite sides of the abortion debate, we recognize that one side will not suddenly convince the other to drop its deeply held beliefs And we believe that, while disagreeing, we can work together to find common ground."

The "common ground," was, once again, increased government--in this case government programs to promote contraception. The Prevention First Act, as they named it, would increase accessibility and "awareness and understanding" of emergency contraception. They aimed to ensure that sex education programs have medically accurate information about contraception and "end insurance discrimination against women."

Source: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy, by Amanda Carpenter, p. 96-97 Oct 11, 2006


Alternatives to pro-choice like forced pregnancy in Romania (but we live in America)

When I defend my pro-choice position in the debate over abortion in our country, I frequently refer to Romania, where pregnancy could be monitored on behalf of the state, & to China, where it could be forcibly terminated. One reason I continue to oppose efforts to criminalize abortion is that I do not believe any government should have the power to dictate, through law or police action, a woman's most personal decision.

[The Romanian dictatorship in the 1980s] banned birth control and abortion, insisting that women bear children for the sake of the state. Women told me how they had been carted from their workplace once a month to be examined by government doctors whose task was to make sure they weren't using contraceptives or aborting pregnancies. I could not imagine a more humiliating experience.

In Romania and elsewhere, many children were born unwanted or into families that could not afford to care for them. They became wards of the state, warehoused in orphanages.

Source: Living History, by Hillary Rodham Clinton, p. 354-5 Nov 1, 2003


Must safeguard constitutional rights, including choice

Q: What kind of justice to the Supreme Court would you support?

A: I think the fate of the Supreme Court hangs in the balance. If we take Gov. Bush at his word, his two favorite Justices are Scalia and Thomas, both of whom are committed to overturning Roe v. Wade, ending a woman’s right to choose. I could not go along with that. In the Senate, I will be looking very carefully at the constitutional views [indicating] as to what that nominee believes about basic, fundamental, constitutional rights.

Source: Senate debate in Manhattan Oct 8, 2000

Late term abortion only if life or health are at risk

Q: Are there circumstances when the government should limit choice?

LAZIO: I had a pro-choice record in the House, and I believe in a woman’s right to choose. I support a ban on partial-birth abortions. Senator Moynihan called it “infanticide.” Even former mayor Ed Koch agreed that this was too extreme a procedure. This is an area where I disagree with my opponent. My opponent opposes a ban on partial-birth abortions.

CLINTON: My opponent is wrong. I have said many times that I can support a ban on late-term abortions, including partial-birth abortions, so long as the health and life of the mother is protected. I’ve met women who faced this heart-wrenching decision toward the end of a pregnancy. Of course it’s a horrible procedure. No one would argue with that. But if your life is at stake, if your health is at stake, if the potential for having any more children is at stake, this must be a woman’s choice.

Source: Senate debate in Manhattan Oct 8, 2000

Remain vigilant on a woman’s right to chose

I am and always have been pro-choice, and that is not a right any of should take for granted. There are a number of forces at work in our society that would try to turn back the clock and undermine a woman’s right to chose, and [we] must remain vigilant.
Source: New York Times, pg.A11 Jan 22, 2000

Keep abortion safe, legal and rare

We come to [the abortion] issue as men and women, young and old, some far beyond years when we have to worry about getting pregnant, others too young to remember what it was like in the days before Roe v. Wade. But I think it’s essential that as Americans we look for that common ground that we can all stand upon. [Our] core beliefs and values. can guide us in reaching our goal of keeping abortion safe, legal and rare into the next century.
Source: Remarks to NARAL, Washington DC Jan 22, 1999

Being pro-choice is not being pro-abortion

I have met thousands and thousands of pro-choice men and women. I have never met anyone who is pro-abortion. Being pro-choice is not being pro-abortion. Being pro-choice is trusting the individual to make the right decision for herself and her family, and not entrusting that decision to anyone wearing the authority of government in any regard.
Source: Remarks at NARAL, Washington, DC Jan 22, 1999

Reach out to teens to reduce teen sex problems

Fewer teens are having sex, getting pregnant, and having abortions, but there are clearly too many young people who have not gotten the message. Every teenager must be reached. More has to be done to reach out to young men, and enlist them in the campaign to make abortions rare, and to make it possible for them to define their lives in terms other than what they imagine sexual prowess and fatherhood being.
Source: Remarks at NARAL, Washington, D.C. Jan 22, 1999

Supports parental notice & family planning  (but look at her vote on it below)

If you can presume that a child is competent to make a decision, you still want that child to have parental guidance whenever possible. But realistically, we know that in many cases that is not possible.

I believe in parental notification. I think there are exceptions. There are situations in which the family is so dysfunctional that notification is not appropriate. In general, I think families should be part of helping their children through this.

Source: Unique Voice, p.186-87 Feb 3, 1997

Cairo Document: right to abortion but not as family planning

The Cairo Document, drafted at the International Conference on Population and Development in 1994, reaffirms that "in no case should abortion be promoted as a method of family planning." And it recognizes "the basic right of all couples and individuals to decide freely and responsibly the number, spacing, and timing of their children and to have the information and means to do so." Women & men should have the right to make this most intimate of all decisions free of discrimination or coercion.
Source: It Takes A Village, by Hillary Clinton, p. 63 Sep 25, 1996


Hillary Clinton on Voting Record

Voted liberal line on partial birth & harm to fetus

    Hillary's votes all echo the liberal line in the Senate
  • She opposed the ban on partial birth abortions
  • She came down against criminalizing harm to a fetus during an attack on the mother
  • She opposed a travel ban to Cuba
  • She opposed a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage
  • She backed extending the ban on assault rifles for 10 years
  • She was against Bush's tax cuts
  • She opposed repealing the estate tax
  • She opposed limits on class action lawsuits.
Source: Condi vs. Hillary, by Dick Morris, p. 85-86 Oct 11, 2005

Voted YES on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines.

Allows federal funding for research that utilizes human embryonic stem cells, regardless of the date on which the stem cells were derived from a human embryo, provided such embryos:
  1. have been donated from in vitro fertilization clinics;
  2. were created for the purposes of fertility treatment;
  3. were in excess of the needs of the individuals seeking such treatment and would otherwise be discarded; and
  4. were donated by such individuals with written informed consent and without any financial or other inducements.

Proponents support voting YES because:

Since 2 years ago, the last Stem Cell bill, public support has surged for stem cells. Research is proceeding unfettered and, in some cases, without ethical standards in other countries. And even when these countries have ethical standards, our failures are allowing them to gain the scientific edge over the US. Some suggest that it is Congress' role to tell researchers what kinds of cells to use. I suggest we are not the arbiters of research. Instead, we should foster all of these methods, and we should adequately fund and have ethical oversight over all ethical stem cell research.

Opponents support voting NO because:

A good deal has changed in the world of science. Amniotic fluid stem cells are now available to open a broad new area of research. I think the American people would welcome us having a hearing to understand more about this promising new area of science. As it stands today, we will simply have to debate the bill on the merits of information that is well over 2 years old, and I think that is unfortunate.

The recent findings of the pluripotent epithelial cells demonstrates how quickly the world has changed. Wouldn't it be nice to have the researcher before our committee and be able to ask those questions so we may make the best possible judgment for the American people?
Status: Vetoed by Pres. Bush Bill passed, 63-34

Reference: Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act; Bill S.5 & H.R.3 ; vote number 2007-127 on Apr 11, 2007

Voted NO on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions.

This bill prohibits taking minors across State lines in circumvention of laws requiring the involvement of parents in abortion decisions. Makes an exception for an abortion necessary to save the life of the minor. Authorizes any parent to sue unless such parent committed an act of incest with the minor. Imposes a fine and/or prison term of up to one year on a physician who performs an abortion on an out-of-state minor in violation of parental notification requirements in their home state.

Proponents recommend voting YES because:

This bill deals with how young girls are being secretly taken across State lines for the purpose of abortion, without the consent of their parents or even the knowledge of their parents, in violation of the laws of the State in which they live. 45 states have enacted some sort of parental consent laws or parental notification law. By simply secreting a child across State lines, one can frustrate the State legislature's rules. It is subverting and defeating valid, constitutionally approved rights parents have.

Opponents recommend voting NO because:

Some States have parental consent laws, some don't. In my particular State, it has been voted down because my people feel that if you ask them, "Do they want their kids to come to their parents?", absolutely. But if you ask them, "Should you force them to do so, even in circumstances where there could be trouble that comes from that?", they say no.

This bill emanates from a desire that our children come to us when we have family matters, when our children are in trouble, that they not be fearful, that they not be afraid that they disappoint us, that they be open with us and loving toward us, and we toward them. This is what we want to have happen. The question is: Can Big Brother Federal Government force this on our families? That is where we will differ.

Reference: Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act; Bill S.403 ; vote number 2006-216 on Jul 25, 2006

Voted YES on $100M to reduce teen pregnancy by education & contraceptives.

Vote to adopt an amendment to the Senate's 2006 Fiscal Year Budget that allocates $100 million for the prevention of unintended pregnancies. A YES vote would expand access to preventive health care services that reduce unintended pregnancy (including teen pregnancy), reduce the number of abortions, and improve access to women's health care. A YES vote would:
  • Increase funding and access to family planning services
  • Funds legislation that requires equitable prescription coverage for contraceptives under health plans
  • Funds legislation that would create and expand teen pregnancy prevention programs and education programs concerning emergency contraceptives
Reference: Appropriation to expand access to preventive health care services; Bill S.Amdt. 244 to S Con Res 18 ; vote number 2005-75 on Mar 17, 2005

Voted NO on criminal penalty for harming unborn fetus during other crime.

Bill would make it a criminal offense to harm or kill a fetus during the commission of a violent crime. The measure would set criminal penalties, the same as those that would apply if harm or death happened to the pregnant woman, for those who harm a fetus. It is not required that the individual have prior knowledge of the pregnancy or intent to harm the fetus. This bill prohibits the death penalty from being imposed for such an offense. The bill states that its provisions should not be interpreted to apply a woman's actions with respect to her pregnancy.
Reference: Unborn Victims of Violence Act; Bill S.1019/HR.1997 ; vote number 2004-63 on Mar 25, 2004

Voted NO on banning partial birth abortions except for maternal life.

S. 3 As Amended; Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. Vote to pass a bill banning a medical procedure, which is commonly known as "partial-birth" abortion. Those who performed this procedure would then face fines and up to two years in prison, the women to whom this procedure is performed on are not held criminally liable. This bill would make the exception for cases in which a women's life is in danger, not for cases where a women's health is in danger.
Reference: Bill S.3 ; vote number 2003-51 on Mar 12, 2003

Recommended by EMILY's List of pro-choice women.

Clinton is endorsed by EMILY's list, a pro-choice PAC:

EMILY’s List operates as a donor network, recommending pro-choice Democratic women candidates to its members, who contribute directly to the candidates they choose. In the 1999-2000 election cycle, EMILY’s List members contributed $9.3 million to pro-choice Democratic women candidates. In its 16-year history, EMILY’s List has helped to elect four women governors, eleven women to the United States Senate and 53 women to the U.S. House of Representatives. “Women continue to be the power players in Democratic politics,” said Ellen R. Malcolm, president of EMILY's List. “In 2002, redistricting could result in as many as 75 open seats, creating multiple opportunities to recruit and elect pro-choice Democratic women.”

Source: Press Release on Diane Watson (CA-32) victory 01-EL1 on Apr 11, 2001

Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record.

Clinton scores 100% by NARAL on pro-choice voting record

For over thirty years, NARAL Pro-Choice America has been the political arm of the pro-choice movement and a strong advocate of reproductive freedom and choice. NARAL Pro-Choice America's mission is to protect and preserve the right to choose while promoting policies and programs that improve women's health and make abortion less necessary. NARAL Pro-Choice America works to educate Americans and officeholders about reproductive rights and health issues and elect pro-choice candidates at all levels of government. The NARAL ratings are based on the votes the organization considered most important; the numbers reflect the percentage of time the representative voted the organization's preferred position.

Source: NARAL website 03n-NARAL on Dec 31, 2003

Expand embryonic stem cell research.

Clinton signed a letter from 58 Senators to the President

Dear Mr. President:

We write to urge you to expand the current federal policy concerning embryonic stem cell research.

Embryonic stem cells have the potential to be used to treat and better understand deadly and disabling diseases and conditions that affect more than 100 million Americans, such as cancer, heart disease, diabetes, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, and many others.

We appreciate your words of support for the enormous potential of this research, and we know that you intended your policy to help promote this research to its fullest. As you know, the Administration's policy limits federal funding only to embryonic stem cells that were derived by August 9, 2001.

However, scientists have told us that since the policy went into effect more than two years ago, we have learned that the embryonic stem cell lines eligible for federal funding will not be suitable to effectively promote this research. We therefore feel it is essential to relax the restrictions in the current policy for this research to be fully explored.

Among the difficult challenges with the current policy are the following:

  • While it originally appeared that 78 embryonic stem cell lines would be available for research, only 19 are available to researchers.
  • All available stem cell lines are contaminated with mouse feeder cells, making their therapeutic use for humans uncertain.
  • It is increasingly difficult to attract new scientists to this area of research because of concerns that funding restrictions will keep this research from being successful.
  • Despite the fact that U.S. scientists were the first to derive human embryonic stem cells, leadership in this area of research is shifting to other countries.
We would very much like to work with you to modify the current embryonic stem cell policy so that it provides this area of research the greatest opportunity to lead to the treatments and cures for which we are all hoping.
Source: Letter from 58 Senators to the President 04-SEN8 on Jun 4, 2004

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rudy does not represent MY values

This was originally posted on my blog on Nov. 30

http://njchristiansforhuckabee.wordpress.com


This topic may open a whole new can of worms for the former Mayor, and likely ruin his Presidential hopes:

Giuliani’s Mistress Used N.Y. Police as Taxi Service

Although she’s now Mrs. Giuliani III, back in early 2000, while Married to Donna Hanover, Mr. Mayor was having his trysts with Judith Nathan. Personally, I do have a problem with this: a “conservative Republican” cannot run a campaign hoping to capture Values voters – regardless that there are some unfortunate Evangelical leaders backing the ex-Mayor. But there’s another twist behind the tryst: The NYPD billed an obscure City agency newly created back then by the Mayor. The question is – Why?

We all know that Mayors require a round-the-clock security detail, specifically the NYPD (for NYC Mayors). But while all NYPD city expenses are submitted to “the city”, why go out of your way to “hide” these expenses from oversight?

Former officials told ABCNews.com the extra costs involved overtime and per diem costs for officers traveling with Giuliani to secret weekend rendezvous with Nathan in the fashionable Hamptons resort area on Long Island.

When the New York City comptroller began to question the accounting, Mayor Giuliani’s office declined to provide details to city security, officials told ABCNews.com today.

“The Comptroller’s Office made repeated requests for the information in 2001 and 2002 but was informed that due to security concerns the information could not be provided,” a spokesperson for the comptroller’s office said.

Appearing in public for the first time today, Giuliani told ABC News the accusations he assigned a police security detail to his mistress and helped to hide the expenses in the mammoth New York City budget “a pre-debate hit job.”

“I’m sorry, but I still don’t understand why they filed these expenses the way they did,” he said. OK – that’s what he says, but well before it was publicly known he was seeing her, then-married New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani provided a police driver and city car for his mistress Judith Nathan, former senior city officials tell the Blotter on ABCNews.com.

“She used the PD as her personal taxi service,” said one former city official who worked for Giuliani.

New York papers reported in 2000 that the city had provided a security detail for Nathan, who became Giuliani’s third wife after his divorce from Donna Hanover, who also had her own police security detail at the same time.

Former officials close to Giuliani say he had “zero” to do with how the police security expenses for Judith Nathan, who he since married, were accounted in the city budget.

The Giuliani campaign said it would also provide a former deputy mayor, Randy Mastro, to respond to the allegations later today.

here’s the story that’s generating buzz throughout Washington political circles.

So why do I think this may open the proverbial can of worms? Well, it comes down to his judgement.

Lets look at Kerik:

Rudy Giuliani appointed Kerik police commissioner in 2000 when he was New York mayor, and he endorsed Kerik’s 2004 nomination to head the Department of Homeland Security. Days after President Bush introduced Kerik as his nominee, however, Kerik announced he was withdrawing his name because of tax issues involving his former nanny.

Giuliani has said he should have done a better job of vetting Kerik. (Give me a break: Giuliani and Kerik have been friends for a looong time.)

Seattle Times, Dec. 14, 2004:

NEW YORK — Bernard Kerik’s nanny problem might have proved the least of his troubles if the Bush administration had pressed ahead with its nomination of him to become secretary of homeland security.

The past few days have seen news reports about a rash of possible personal and professional improprieties on the part of the former New York City police commissioner, including big stock-option windfalls, connections with people suspected of doing business with the mob and, yesterday, allegations he had simultaneous extramarital affairs with two women.

The newspaper Newsday reported that investigators conducting a background check of Kerik last week uncovered that the former nominee had been married to a woman he has apparently kept a secret for the past 20 years. Friends of his said they were not aware of the woman, and Kerik did not acknowledge the marriage in his best-selling autobiography, “The Lost Son: A Life in Pursuit of Justice.”

Instead, he wrote about only two marriages, one to a New Jersey woman named Jacqueline, whom he married in 1983 when he was 28, and one to his current wife, Hala. But Kerik, who withdrew his name from consideration for the nation’s top security post on Friday, was also married to the former Linda Hales in North Carolina.

(Remember – Giuliani pushed the White House to nominate Kerik)

Citing unidentified sources, the New York Daily News said Kerik had overlapping affairs with Judith Regan, the publisher of his recent memoir, and a city corrections officer. He used the same New York City apartment for liaisons with the women during his 18-month tenure as head of the nation’s largest police department, ending in 2001, the paper said.

Yesterday, Kerik said he wanted to apologize “to anybody who’s been brought into this unnecessarily,” including Regan and former Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, a close friend and business associate who had promoted the former street cop’s Cabinet candidacy.

Other recent reports claim that around the time of the alleged affairs, Kerik accepted unreported gifts of thousands of dollars in cash and other items from associates at a New Jersey construction company while serving under Giuliani, first as corrections chief, then as police commissioner.

Lastly, I found an interesting piece of information too: In today’s World Net Daily commentary by Jane Chastain titled President Giuliani: My worst nightmare: she pens: “Giuliani is a liberal with a few conservative tendencies – very few. In 1988, Rudy’s mother, Helen, said, “He only became a Republican after he began to get all these jobs from them. He’s definitely not a conservative Republican.” This from his Mom!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Huckabee: I Beat the Clinton Machine Twice

http://njchristiansforhuckabee.wordpress.com

WASHINGTON — Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor who once trailed badly with little money and a skeletal campaign staff, has now pulled ahead of former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney to steal the lead.

Last week, Newsmax caught up with Huckabee during his visit to Washington, D.C.

WASHINGTON — Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor who once trailed badly with little money and a skeletal campaign staff, has now pulled ahead of former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney to steal the lead.

Last week, Newsmax caught up with Huckabee during his visit to Washington, D.C.

Huckabee, ecstatic about the rising poll numbers, explained the momentum factor: “We’re the only campaign that has had one trajectory, and that’s been forward and upward… We’re the only campaign that has not had a peak and now has slipped backwards.”

According to a Des Moines Register poll out this past weekend, Huckabee has the solid support of 29 percent of Iowans who say they definitely or probably will attend the Republican Party’s caucuses on Jan. 3. Romney placed second with 24 percent.

Meanwhile, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani is not catching fire in Iowa, nor is former Sen. Fred Thompson, pulling 13 percent and 9 percent, respectively.

The phenomenon that is Mike Huckabee has not been lost on others deeply involved in the 2008 contest. Bill Clinton has candidly admitted that Huckabee may just be wife Hillary’s worst nightmare in a general-election matchup.

And Sen. Barack Obama is on record saying that Huckabee is his personal favorite GOP candidate.

Could the Democrats really want Mike Huckabee as their opponent next year?

“I think it just shows how smart these guys really, really are,” Huckabee tells Newsmax. “It’s an honestly good thing to have people who look at you as a formidable candidate. I think sometimes there are more Democrats who worry about me than the Republicans do.”

Newsmax last visited with candidate Huckabee this past summer.

Today, Huckabee exudes confidence.

Months ago, Huckabee stressed his greatest strength: he hadn’t “flip-flopped” on the signature issues.

“I have nothing to explain,” Huckabee said then with confidence. “I’m comfortable in my own skin.”

Iowa voters seems to be reacting to Huckabee’s authenticity.

Gena Norris, who along with her TV action star husband Chuck Norris, has boarded the Huckabee bandwagon big-time, reinforced the idea.

“He is just soooo genuine,” she confides to Newsmax.

She and Chuck were with Huckabee in St. Petersburg, Fla., for the latest debate and had joined him as well in Washington.

Mr. Norris notes that committing to Huckabee was not an easy thing:

“It was a tough thing because Duncan Hunter is a very close friend of mine and Fred Thompson is a good friend of mine. But the thing is that I had to go with my heart who I thought would be the best person to lead us into the next generation — especially with the young people.”

For his part, Huckabee is thrilled to have Walker, Texas Ranger in his corner

“We had a lot of fun and put together an introductory spot that was the number one watched YouTube spot for a couple of days and really got a lot of attention,” he says.

Huckabee deftly sidesteps a Newsmax comparison of his own successes with that of fellow Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul. The Texas congressman, like Huckabee, is also doing well as an outside-the-pack candidate, getting attention and raising a lot of money online.

The easygoing, guitar-playing candidate simply refrains from rapping the competition. He wants to keep the formula positive and upbeat.

Not that his polite model has rubbed off on everyone else. As his poll numbers have climbed, so have the attacks. But Huckabee sees a silver lining in the vitriol:

“It’s almost as if that the more the negative attacks come from the other campaigns, the better our numbers get,” he said. “Not that I’m wishing upon myself more attacks,” he adds with a smile.

Nice guy Huckabee is a firm believer in Ronald Reagan’s 11th Commandment: “Thou shall not speak ill of a fellow Republican.” And that code of conduct applies even to a comment about his number one nemesis, Rudy Giuliani.

“I believe in Ronald Regan’s 11th Commandment. Actually, I like Rudy and, you know, here’s why I like him. I disagree with him on several key issues, particularly the social issues.”

The Huckabee goes for the jugular in his easygoing manner.

“We’re not on the same page when it comes to the sanctity of life, the Second Amendment or same-sex marriage, but let me tell you what I admire him for . . .” Huckabee says, scoring big points with the religious right Republicans.

Huckabee admits his success has even surprised him and his campaign staff, and not just his Iowa success.

Huckabee notes that his campaign has built momentum in places like Texas, Florida, and South Carolina – places “where we shouldn’t even be in play.”

But in play he is, with poll rankings of second, second, and third, respectively, in those key states. And the reason for the good numbers is exactly what?

“Not because we have spent money,” he explains, “not because we got staff on the ground, not because we have run a minute’s worth of advertising, but purely on the strength of what mostly is happening in the blogosphere, people contacting people, the debates — all of those things have an accumulative effect.”

Best Equipped to Battle the Clinton Machine

The candidate likes to point out that in Arkansas when he was sworn in as governor, only 11 out of 100 members of the state House were Republican. Furthermore, there were only four out of 35 senators who were Republican.

“I went into a legislature that was more lopsided than any other legislature in the country including Massachusetts,” Huckabee explains. “No governor faced a more overwhelming opposite-party legislature than I did and that legislature was heavily populated by people politically related to the Clintons.

“Bill and Hillary campaigned for every opponent that I have ever had,” he says, explaining how he took on the Clinton machine in Arkansas and beat them twice.

Huckabee notes that his unique advantage is that, in his opinion, nobody running for president knows the Clintons better — and knows how their campaigns will be operated as well as he does.

“Believe me, the political machinery that they set up in Arkansas was the machinery against which I had to run every time I faced an opponent.”

Huckabee believes he can, and has, translated his Arkansas political savvy to the national stage.

“I think it’s really a matter of touching people at all parts of the spectrum. For example, I’m the first Republican in 119 years to get the endorsement of Machinist and Aerospace Worker’s Union. To be a Republican and get that endorsement at all is remarkable.

He even thinks he can tap into the African-American vote, citing CNN exit polls that showed he garnered 48 percent of the black vote in his re-election bid for governor.

Huckabee strongly maintains that he has the credentials to appeal to independent and disgusted and fed-up voters. He doesn’t have a Washington address; he’s not with the inside-the-Beltway crew and most importantly he is not part of what he sees as a highly discredited and unpopular set of lawmakers sitting atop Capitol Hill.

“Quite frankly this city isn’t just real popular out there in America right now, and if you see the polls you would say, well, boy, the president is not very popular. The only thing less popular is Congress right now.”

Huckabee does admit to one perhaps significant chink in his armor. Some might perceive him to be soft on illegal immigration.

He doesn’t think this is the case, however, and hopes that the rank and file voter will see that he simply wants to add a measure of fairness to the firmness.

“Some people want me to be a lot harsher [on immigration policy],” Huckabee explains.

“When I realized that there are kids [children of illegal immigrants] out there who are as good as me and they didn’t have a choice where they were born; they didn’t have a choice to whom they were born; then I have to ask myself do I really want to put my heal in their face no matter how hard they work?

“My soul won’t let me pander that issue any further than that and I’m not going to,” he says with determination.

Chuck Norris says that it’s Huckabee’s compassion for the children of illegals that is one of the factors that moved him to support his candidacy.

The actor teaches martial arts to Hispanic youngsters in Texas and sees any policy of blanket expulsion as counterproductive to the kids who are achieving the American dream through hard work and furthering their educations.

Norris says it’s all part of the complete Huckabee package.

“I really think that he’s a people’s president. I was always a people’s actor. Critics hated me. For 30 years all I got was negative press from the critics, but the people took to me and because of that I did 23 movies and 203 episodes of ‘Walker Texas Ranger.’”

© 2007 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Huckabee, ecstatic about the rising poll numbers, explained the momentum factor: “We’re the only campaign that has had one trajectory, and that’s been forward and upward… We’re the only campaign that has not had a peak and now has slipped backwards.”

According to a Des Moines Register poll out this past weekend, Huckabee has the solid support of 29 percent of Iowans who say they definitely or probably will attend the Republican Party’s caucuses on Jan. 3. Romney placed second with 24 percent.

Meanwhile, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani is not catching fire in Iowa, nor is former Sen. Fred Thompson, pulling 13 percent and 9 percent, respectively.

The phenomenon that is Mike Huckabee has not been lost on others deeply involved in the 2008 contest. Bill Clinton has candidly admitted that Huckabee may just be wife Hillary’s worst nightmare in a general-election matchup.

And Sen. Barack Obama is on record saying that Huckabee is his personal favorite GOP candidate.

Could the Democrats really want Mike Huckabee as their opponent next year?

“I think it just shows how smart these guys really, really are,” Huckabee tells Newsmax. “It’s an honestly good thing to have people who look at you as a formidable candidate. I think sometimes there are more Democrats who worry about me than the Republicans do.”

Newsmax last visited with candidate Huckabee this past summer.

Today, Huckabee exudes confidence.

Months ago, Huckabee stressed his greatest strength: he hadn’t “flip-flopped” on the signature issues.

“I have nothing to explain,” Huckabee said then with confidence. “I’m comfortable in my own skin.”

Iowa voters seems to be reacting to Huckabee’s authenticity.

Gena Norris, who along with her TV action star husband Chuck Norris, has boarded the Huckabee bandwagon big-time, reinforced the idea.

“He is just soooo genuine,” she confides to Newsmax.

She and Chuck were with Huckabee in St. Petersburg, Fla., for the latest debate and had joined him as well in Washington.

Mr. Norris notes that committing to Huckabee was not an easy thing:

“It was a tough thing because Duncan Hunter is a very close friend of mine and Fred Thompson is a good friend of mine. But the thing is that I had to go with my heart who I thought would be the best person to lead us into the next generation — especially with the young people.”

For his part, Huckabee is thrilled to have Walker, Texas Ranger in his corner

“We had a lot of fun and put together an introductory spot that was the number one watched YouTube spot for a couple of days and really got a lot of attention,” he says.

Huckabee deftly sidesteps a Newsmax comparison of his own successes with that of fellow Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul. The Texas congressman, like Huckabee, is also doing well as an outside-the-pack candidate, getting attention and raising a lot of money online.

The easygoing, guitar-playing candidate simply refrains from rapping the competition. He wants to keep the formula positive and upbeat.

Not that his polite model has rubbed off on everyone else. As his poll numbers have climbed, so have the attacks. But Huckabee sees a silver lining in the vitriol:

“It’s almost as if that the more the negative attacks come from the other campaigns, the better our numbers get,” he said. “Not that I’m wishing upon myself more attacks,” he adds with a smile.

Nice guy Huckabee is a firm believer in Ronald Reagan’s 11th Commandment: “Thou shall not speak ill of a fellow Republican.” And that code of conduct applies even to a comment about his number one nemesis, Rudy Giuliani.

“I believe in Ronald Regan’s 11th Commandment. Actually, I like Rudy and, you know, here’s why I like him. I disagree with him on several key issues, particularly the social issues.”

The Huckabee goes for the jugular in his easygoing manner.

“We’re not on the same page when it comes to the sanctity of life, the Second Amendment or same-sex marriage, but let me tell you what I admire him for . . .” Huckabee says, scoring big points with the religious right Republicans.

Huckabee admits his success has even surprised him and his campaign staff, and not just his Iowa success.

Huckabee notes that his campaign has built momentum in places like Texas, Florida, and South Carolina – places “where we shouldn’t even be in play.”

But in play he is, with poll rankings of second, second, and third, respectively, in those key states. And the reason for the good numbers is exactly what?

“Not because we have spent money,” he explains, “not because we got staff on the ground, not because we have run a minute’s worth of advertising, but purely on the strength of what mostly is happening in the blogosphere, people contacting people, the debates — all of those things have an accumulative effect.”

Best Equipped to Battle the Clinton Machine

The candidate likes to point out that in Arkansas when he was sworn in as governor, only 11 out of 100 members of the state House were Republican. Furthermore, there were only four out of 35 senators who were Republican.

“I went into a legislature that was more lopsided than any other legislature in the country including Massachusetts,” Huckabee explains. “No governor faced a more overwhelming opposite-party legislature than I did and that legislature was heavily populated by people politically related to the Clintons.

“Bill and Hillary campaigned for every opponent that I have ever had,” he says, explaining how he took on the Clinton machine in Arkansas and beat them twice.

Huckabee notes that his unique advantage is that, in his opinion, nobody running for president knows the Clintons better — and knows how their campaigns will be operated as well as he does.

“Believe me, the political machinery that they set up in Arkansas was the machinery against which I had to run every time I faced an opponent.”

Huckabee believes he can, and has, translated his Arkansas political savvy to the national stage.

“I think it’s really a matter of touching people at all parts of the spectrum. For example, I’m the first Republican in 119 years to get the endorsement of Machinist and Aerospace Worker’s Union. To be a Republican and get that endorsement at all is remarkable.

He even thinks he can tap into the African-American vote, citing CNN exit polls that showed he garnered 48 percent of the black vote in his re-election bid for governor.

Huckabee strongly maintains that he has the credentials to appeal to independent and disgusted and fed-up voters. He doesn’t have a Washington address; he’s not with the inside-the-Beltway crew and most importantly he is not part of what he sees as a highly discredited and unpopular set of lawmakers sitting atop Capitol Hill.

“Quite frankly this city isn’t just real popular out there in America right now, and if you see the polls you would say, well, boy, the president is not very popular. The only thing less popular is Congress right now.”

Huckabee does admit to one perhaps significant chink in his armor. Some might perceive him to be soft on illegal immigration.

He doesn’t think this is the case, however, and hopes that the rank and file voter will see that he simply wants to add a measure of fairness to the firmness.

“Some people want me to be a lot harsher [on immigration policy],” Huckabee explains.

“When I realized that there are kids [children of illegal immigrants] out there who are as good as me and they didn’t have a choice where they were born; they didn’t have a choice to whom they were born; then I have to ask myself do I really want to put my heal in their face no matter how hard they work?

“My soul won’t let me pander that issue any further than that and I’m not going to,” he says with determination.

Chuck Norris says that it’s Huckabee’s compassion for the children of illegals that is one of the factors that moved him to support his candidacy.

The actor teaches martial arts to Hispanic youngsters in Texas and sees any policy of blanket expulsion as counterproductive to the kids who are achieving the American dream through hard work and furthering their educations.

Norris says it’s all part of the complete Huckabee package.

“I really think that he’s a people’s president. I was always a people’s actor. Critics hated me. For 30 years all I got was negative press from the critics, but the people took to me and because of that I did 23 movies and 203 episodes of ‘Walker Texas Ranger.’”

© 2007 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Trouble on the Romney Trail


By: Dick Morris and Eileen McGann

This is not a good time to be Mitt Romney. After almost a year of having the Iowa and New Hampshire airwaves to himself, he is now facing a challenge on the right from Mike Huckabee and Fred Thompson and on the left from Rudy Giuliani.

Pressed from both sides, he is leaking votes. Where once a sweep of the table of the early states (Iowa, New Hampshire, Michigan and South Carolina) appeared in the cards, he is now looking at a possible defeat in Iowa, derailing his plans.

The latest Iowa Rasmussen Poll (11-26-07) shows Huckabee in the lead at 28 percent with Romney at 25 percent, and both Thompson and Giuliani trailing way back at 12 percent. The average of the past five Iowa polls, computed by Real Clear Politics, Romney holds a narrow 27-24 lead over Huckabee.

In the CNN-YouTube debate, Romney and Rudy ripped each other apart to the likely benefit of Huckabee who, apart from a bump or two, remained serenely atop the debate while others kicked and clawed below.

Romney is taking flack for his flip-flop-flip over abortion. Voters know that his statement that he changed his mind to become pro-life is belied by the fact that he had changed it before to become pro-choice when he decided to run in Massachusetts. His unreliability on this issue combines with his pro-gay rights comments during his Senate race against Ted Kennedy to raise doubts about him on the right.

The fact is that the only two things holding Romney aloft in the early states were the fact that he was the only alternative to Giuliani and that he was spending a bundle on campaign advertising.

For many months the other campaigns were not on the air in Iowa or New Hampshire. Why Giuliani didn't advertise is a mystery and likely the subject of future political science classes. Huckabee, of course, was broke, and Thompson couldn't get his act together in time.

But now that everybody is on the air, Huckabee is emerging as a new alternative to Giuliani for socially conservative voters. Reliably pro-life and anti-gay marriage, he is now emerging as the real thing -- a social conservative alternative to the ersatz Romney version.

And, of course, he's not a Mormon. Many Republicans remain fearful that nominating a Mormon would be tantamount to handing the election to the Democrats.

If Huckabee beats Romnney in Iowa, it may imperil the rest of the four-state sweep which Romney is anticipating.

New Hampshire, which holds its primary just five days after Iowa, has always been Romney territory since two-thirds of the state watches Boston television where Mitt has starred as governor for the past four years. But, Romney has always drawn about a third of the vote there while Giuliani, McCain and Huckabee -- that's the order -- have divided the rest.

But, if one-third of the primary voters are backing Romney in New Hampshire, what about the other two-thirds? Universally known because of his Massachusetts governorship, Romney may have hit his ceiling at a third of the vote. And, should he lose Iowa, he may drop into the high 20s. Meanwhile, the two-thirds that have never backed Romney may consolidate around Giuliani and Huckabee. The latest polls in New Hampshire show Huckabee rising, most recently to 14 percent of the vote. (Rasmussen's latest has Romney at 34 percent, McCain and Rudy tied at 15 percent and Huckabee at 14 percent). A Huckabee victory might push him past Romney. If Mitt doesn't win either Iowa or New Hampshire, he is finished.

Giuliani, on the other hand, could lose both early states and live to fight again down the road. With a national lead and a 50-state presence, Rudy, like Hillary, cannot be knocked out in the early going.

And a lot will depend on whether Independents vote in New Hampshire's Democratic or Republican primaries. If Hillary loses in Iowa, they will probably stay in the Democratic contest. But if she wins, all but ending the Democratic battle, they will probably come into the Republican contest. Most of the Independents who enter the Republican primary probably will support either Giuliani or McCain, giving them a boost at the expense of both Romney and Huckabee.

But, if Hillary is in trouble in Iowa -- as we think she is -- the Independents will stay in the Democratic contest and those who remain in the Republican primary are likely to be stalwarts of either Romney or Huckabee.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »